Agenda and minutes

Venue: Gordon Room, Worthing Town Hall

Contact: Katy McMullan
Democratic Services Officer
01903 221006  Email:

No. Item


Declarations of Interest / Substitute Members

Members and Officers must declare any disclosable pecuniary interests in relation to any business on the agenda. Declarations should also be made at any stage an interest becomes apparent during the meeting.


If in doubt contact the Legal or Democratic Services representative for this meeting.


There were no substitute members.

There were no declarations of interest.


Public Question Time

So as to provide the best opportunity for the Committee to provide the public with the fullest answer, questions from the public should be submitted by midday on Monday 14 August 2023.


Where relevant notice of a question has not been given, the person presiding may either choose to give a response at the meeting or respond by undertaking to provide a written response within three working days.


Questions should be submitted to Democratic Services -


(Note: Public Question Time will last for a maximum of 30 minutes)


There were no questions from members of the public.


Members Questions

Pre-submitted Members questions are pursuant to rule 12 of the Council & Committee Procedure Rules.


Questions should be submitted by midday on Monday 14 August 2023 to  Democratic Services,


(Note: Member Question Time will operate for a maximum of 30 minutes.)


There were no questions from members.



To consider a report by the Director for Sustainability & Resources, copy attached as item 4.


Before the Sub-Committee was a report by the Director for Communities, which has been circulated to all Members, a copy of which is attached to the signed copy of these minutes as item 3.


Presenting Officer outlined the TEN served


The Licensing Officer outlined the TEN served and the subsequent Notice of Objection. The TEN had been served by the licence holder in order that a ‘Bank Holiday Birthday Celebration’ could be held at the premises. The Environmental Protection Officer had submitted the Notice of Objection on grounds of public nuisance. The Committee was advised that the Licensing Objective relating to public nuisance was the only relevant objective in this meeting.


The Environmental Protection Officer confirmed that the Licensing Officer had provided an accurate outline of the Notice of Objection.


Questions from Members for the presenting Officer


There were none.


Representation from the Environmental Protection Officer


The Officer clarified that a large number of complaints of loud music, particularly at weekends, had been received in regards to the premises. Investigations had shown that the complaints were justified and as a result a Notice of Abatement had been served on the premises. Allowing this TEN could result in a breach of the notice.


Questions from Members to the Environmental Protection Officer


Members queried how many complaints had been deemed founded and at what time of the night was the noise level being complained about.


The Officer explained that six separate nearby households had complained and the timings of the unacceptable noise was usually from about 11pm onwards. He stated that the Environmental Protection Team had taken recordings at 1am showing the base could be heard in neighbouring properties.


Questions from the Licence Holder to the Environmental Protection Officer


The licence holder enquired what the decibel recordings were and where the complaints had originated from.


The Officer clarified that the recordings measured approximately 28 DB inside one of the neighbouring properties. He also confirmed that the complaints had been from residences in neighbouring streets and dwellings.


Representation from the Licence Holder


The licence holder explained that when he had bought the premises, the previous owner, when it had been Bar Ten, had stated that they never really had many noise complaints. Because of this, he had made no changes within the club assuming that there were no noise issues. He was of the opinion that, as the club had been closed during Covid, neighbours had got used to that situation but now that it was open again they were having to adjust to the noise once more. He explained some of the measures he had taken to address the noise issue such as moving speakers and applying soundproofing to some walls. He also had a Sound Engineer on site at all times. The Licence holder also pointed out that his licence states he has a maximum noise limit of 50 DB inside the premises and they had taken a recent level reading of approximately 40 DB.


Questions from Members to the  ...  view the full minutes text for item LCSC/12/23-24